Change Details

During T133472 handling, a concern has been expressed about the scope of the //editinterface// right. This right allows to edit CSS and JS files, and so inject harmful or privacy-risky content. Some users have expressed in T85713 the opinion the edit interface part is probably the part of administrator right requiring the most trust capital from the community. We would so like this right to be granted by bureaucrats (or, on wiki without bureaucrats, by stewards). This implies to revisit T120348. @MuhammadShuaib Could you run a discussion on ur.wikipedia explaining these arguments and see if there is a consensus to reconfigure the right so any bureaucrat can grant/revoke it instead of sysops?

During T133472 handling, a concern has been expressed about who could grant the //editinterface// right. This right, with editcss and editjs allow to edit the messages interface, CSS and JS files, and so inject harmful or privacy-risky content. Some users have expressed in T85713 the opinion the edit interface part is probably the part of administrator right requiring the most trust capital from the community. We would so like this right to be granted by bureaucrats (or, on wiki without bureaucrats, by stewards). This implies to revisit T120348. @MuhammadShuaib Could you run a discussion on ur.wikipedia explaining these arguments and see if there is a consensus to reconfigure the right so bureaucrat instead of sysops could add users to the edit interface group.

During T133472 handling, a concern has been expressed about the scope ofwho could grant the //editinterface// right. This right, with editcss and editjs allows to editit the messages interface, CSS and JS files, and so inject harmful or privacy-risky content. Some users have expressed in T85713 the opinion the edit interface part is probably the part of administrator right requiring the most trust capital from the community. We would so like this right to be granted by bureaucrats (or, on wiki without bureaucrats, by stewards). This implies to revisit T120348. @MuhammadShuaib Could you run a discussion on ur.wikipedia explaining these arguments and see if there is a consensus to reconfigure the right so anyso bureaucrat can grant/revoke instead of sysops could add users to the edit instead of sysops?terface group.