Change Details

It has been proposed to turn on the special page AboutTopic, and it has also been shortly discussed at nowiki. It has been in use at nnwiki for some time, and users at nowiki has been pointed to examples at that site for examples. Discussed at [[ https://no.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tinget&oldid=18473488#Forslag:_Sl%C3%A5_p%C3%A5_spesialsiden_%C2%ABAboutTopic%C2%BB | w:no:Wikipedia:Tinget#Forslag: Slå på spesialsiden «AboutTopic» ]]. There hasn't been much enthusiasm, but there are neither any fierce resistance either. I guess it is sufficient for evaluating the special page. The site nowiki is about four times the size of nnwiki, so the load should be heigher, even if it would be comparable. See also T130997 and T175172#4151142.

It has been proposed to turn on the special page AboutTopic, and it has also been shortly discussed at nowiki. It has been in use at nnwiki for some time, and users at nowiki has been pointed to examples at that site for examples. Discussed at [[ https://no.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tinget&oldid=18473488#Forslag:_Sl%C3%A5_p%C3%A5_spesialsiden_%C2%ABAboutTopic%C2%BB | w:no:Wikipedia:Tinget#Forslag: Slå på spesialsiden «AboutTopic» ]]. There hasn't been much enthusiasm, but there are neither any fierce resistance either. I guess it is sufficient for evaluating the special page. The site nowiki is about four times the size of nnwiki, so the load would be somewhat higher, even if it would be comparable. See also T130997 and T175172#4151142.

It has been proposed to turn on the special page AboutTopic, and it has also been shortly discussed at nowiki. It has been in use at nnwiki for some time, and users at nowiki has been pointed to examples at that site for examples. Discussed at [[ https://no.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Tinget&oldid=18473488#Forslag:_Sl%C3%A5_p%C3%A5_spesialsiden_%C2%ABAboutTopic%C2%BB | w:no:Wikipedia:Tinget#Forslag: Slå på spesialsiden «AboutTopic» ]]. There hasn't been much enthusiasm, but there are neither any fierce resistance either. I guess it is sufficient for evaluating the special page. The site nowiki is about four times the size of nnwiki, so the load shwould be hesomewhat higher, even if it would be comparable. See also T130997 and T175172#4151142.