### Background
With the addition of several new features (TOC, sticky header) and many accessibility updates (i.e. landmarks, menus) to modern Vector, we want to collect feedback from screenreader users. These changes should be tested with the most common screenreader/browser combinations.
### Questions to answer:
# How are your impressions of the landmark regions in modern vs legacy Vector?
# How are your impressions of the heading structure in modern vs legacy Vector?
# We employ the [[ https://inclusive-components.design/menus-menu-buttons/#tablesofcontent | checkbox hack ]] in our dropdown menu implementation to support no-js users. How accessible are our dropdown menus to screenreader users? Specifically the [[ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/F35213800 | user menu dropdown and the language dropdown]] in modern Vector (no need to evaluate the contents of the language popup).
## Additionally, what are you thoughts on this alternate option, which uses `aria-hidden` on the `label` element to reduce verbosity for screenreaders?
# How does the accessibility of the table of contents compare in modern vs legacy Vector?
# The sticky header in modern Vector is entirely hidden from screenreader users given it contains purely duplicated content. What do you think of this approach?
**Example article:**
Modern Vector - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_bear?useskin=vector-2022&tableofcontents=1&vectorlanguageinmainpageheader=1&vectorlanguageinheader=1
Legacy Vector - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_bear?useskin=vector
**Main page:**
Modern Vector - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?useskin=vector-2022
Legacy Vector - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?useskin=vector