Change Details

Today I discovered that [the MediaWiki.org documentation for CommunityConfiguration](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CommunityConfiguration) claims #communityconfiguration has a [release status](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_status) of `beta`. This doesn't feel accurate, as it is deployed to all Wikipedia projects already (and soon to be deployed to non-Wikipedias as well). Should we formally declare the extension to be `stable`?

Today I discovered that [the MediaWiki.org documentation for CommunityConfiguration](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CommunityConfiguration) claims #communityconfiguration has a [release status](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_status) of `beta`. This doesn't feel accurate, as it is deployed to all Wikipedia projects already (and soon to be deployed to non-Wikipedias as well). Should we formally declare the extension to be `stable`? Features/Fixes we probably want before declaring CommunityConfiguration officially stable: - [ ] {T370534} (including also implementing it, and related removal of hacks like T410459) - [ ] {T371028} - [ ] {T367516}

Today I discovered that [the MediaWiki.org documentation for CommunityConfiguration](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CommunityConfiguration) claims #communityconfiguration has a [release status](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_status) of `beta`. This doesn't feel accurate, as it is deployed to all Wikipedia projects already (and soon to be deployed to non-Wikipedias as well). Should we formally declare the extension to be `stable`? Features/Fixes we probably want before declaring CommunityConfiguration officially stable: - [ ] {T370534} (including also implementing it, and related removal of hacks like T410459) - [ ] {T371028} - [ ] {T367516}