Change Details

In preparation for T193782, we need to think through using [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES | ORES models ]] for scoring pages for review via [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation | AfC ]] and [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol | NPP ]]. The two models that we'll want to use are: * `draftquality`: predicts if the page will need to be speedy deleted (spam, vandalism, attack, or OK). * `wp10`: predicts the likely quality level of the page (Stub, Start, C, B, GA, FA). The following are relevant user stories that we should plan for, as of 2018-05-03: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the four categories in `draftquality` * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the six categories in `wp10`. * As a reviewer, I need all pages listed in the New Pages Feed to be filterable with those models, regardless of namespace. * As a reviewer, I need models to be up-to-date with the latest revision of a page at all times. And a potential user story, about which we'll need to learn more from user conversations: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to sort the New Pages Feed by the scores underlying the categories of `draftquality` and `wp10`. Some technical considerations that been brought up so far in discussion of these user stories (though there are likely many more): * Will it be difficult to re-score these models with every new revision of each page? * What will happen when we score these models on the User namespace, which is currently accessible in the New Pages Feed?

In preparation for T193782, we need to think through using [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES | ORES models ]] for scoring pages for review via [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation | AfC ]] and [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol | NPP ]], specifically in the [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:NewPagesFeed | New Pages Feed ]] interface. The two models that we'll want to use are: * `draftquality`: predicts if the page will need to be speedy deleted (spam, vandalism, attack, or OK). * `wp10`: predicts the likely quality level of the page (Stub, Start, C, B, GA, FA). The following are relevant user stories that we should plan for, as of 2018-05-03: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the four categories in `draftquality` * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the six categories in `wp10`. * As a reviewer, I need a page's `draftquality` category and `wp10` category to be displayed with its entry in the New Pages Feed list. * As a reviewer, I need all pages listed in the New Pages Feed to be filterable with those models, regardless of namespace. * As a reviewer, I need models to be up-to-date with the latest revision of a page at all times. And a potential user story, about which we'll need to learn more from user conversations: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to sort the New Pages Feed by the scores underlying the categories of `draftquality` and `wp10`. Some technical considerations that been brought up so far in discussion of these user stories (though there are likely many more): * Will it be difficult to re-score these models with every new revision of each page? * What will happen when we score these models on the User namespace, which is currently accessible in the New Pages Feed?

In preparation for T193782, we need to think through using [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES | ORES models ]] for scoring pages for review via [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation | AfC ]] and [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol | NPP ]], specifically in the [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:NewPagesFeed | New Pages Feed ]] interface. The two models that we'll want to use are: * `draftquality`: predicts if the page will need to be speedy deleted (spam, vandalism, attack, or OK). * `wp10`: predicts the likely quality level of the page (Stub, Start, C, B, GA, FA). The following are relevant user stories that we should plan for, as of 2018-05-03: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the four categories in `draftquality` * As a reviewer, I need to be able to filter the New Pages Feed by the six categories in `wp10`. * As a reviewer, I need a page's `draftquality` category and `wp10` category to be displayed with its entry in the New Pages Feed list. * As a reviewer, I need all pages listed in the New Pages Feed to be filterable with those models, regardless of namespace. * As a reviewer, I need models to be up-to-date with the latest revision of a page at all times. And a potential user story, about which we'll need to learn more from user conversations: * As a reviewer, I need to be able to sort the New Pages Feed by the scores underlying the categories of `draftquality` and `wp10`. Some technical considerations that been brought up so far in discussion of these user stories (though there are likely many more): * Will it be difficult to re-score these models with every new revision of each page? * What will happen when we score these models on the User namespace, which is currently accessible in the New Pages Feed?