Page MenuHomePhabricator

Re-introduce an edit tag to identify edits that meet the Edit Check heuristic
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

T324733 introduced an edit tag (editcheck-reference) to identify edits that meet the Edit Check heuristic.

T342462 revised the meaning of the editcheck-reference tag.

This ticket is asking us to re-introduce the functionality/meaning editcheck-reference previously held by way of a creating a new tag.

NOTE: the below is borrowed/recycled from T324733.

Story

As someone (e.g. members of the Editing Team and volunteers) motivated to ensure that Edit Check is likely to prompt people to add references in cases where references are in fact needed, I need be able see the edits (on a per project basis) that meet the criteria defined in T324730 so that I can propose adjustments to said criteria to minimize the rate of false positives and, eventually, false negatives.

Requirements

  1. A hidden change tag is appended/associated with all edits, regardless of the editing interface used to make said edits that meet the conditions from T324730:
    1. This hidden change tag should be called: reference-needed
    2. The logic that determines whether the change tag this task is describing needs to be able to be kept in sync with the logic that we're likely to iterate upon by way of T327959

Done

  • All requirements are met
  • mw:Edit_check/Tags is updated to reflect what we end up implementing in this ticket

Event Timeline

Note: we left the team's 19 July conversation uncertain about whether we'd re-introduce the tag T324733 originally introduced.

On reflection, I do think it will be important for volunteers to have a way of seeing the edits that would cause Edit Check to become activated as part of deciding whether they are comfortable with Edit Check being made available on the project in question.

If we're certain we're going to re-introduce a tag with this meaning, I think we should just make a completely new tag for T342462. Gives us continuity of meaning for that tag.

(Also, we deliberately renamed things away from reference-needed when making our initial tag because we were concerned it was too prescriptive...)

If we're certain we're going to re-introduce a tag with this meaning, I think we should just make a completely new tag for T342462. Gives us continuity of meaning for that tag.

(Also, we deliberately renamed things away from reference-needed when making our initial tag because we were concerned it was too prescriptive...)

Per what we discussed as a team offline today, we're going to do as @DLynch is proposing above. As such:

  1. I'm marking this ticket as invalid seeing as how editcheck-reference will retain its current meaning.
  2. Revising the title of T342462 to reflect that rather than repurposing editcheck-reference we'll be introducing an entirely new tag