This task involves the work of analyzing how people qualitatively report their experience with the first iteration of reference Edit Check.
NOTE: the corresponding quantitative analysis will happen in T342404
Decisions to be made
- 1. Will we make any fundamental changes to where and how the Reference Check is presented before investing more energy into refining and scaling the initial approach?
Learning objectives
- Motivation: Do Newcomers and Junior Contributors from SSA perceive Edit Check to be motivating, empowering, and supportive? Said another way: volunteers will not feel discouraged or unfairly punished by the feedback Edit Check presents.
- Auditability: Do Senior Contributors feel like they have sufficient ability to ensure the choices Edit Check presents to newcomers and Junior Contributors align with the broader project's expectations?
Research questions
| Facet | Research Question | Metric(s) for evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Motivation | Do Newcomers and Junior Contributors from SSA perceive Edit Check to be motivating, empowering, and supportive? | TBD |
| Auditability | Do Senior Contributors feel like they have sufficient ability to ensure the choices Edit Check presents to newcomers and Junior Contributors align with the broader project's policies and conventions? | TBD |
This task was inspired by the point User:Joe Roe raised on mediawiki.org.