See https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=113141272
Adding the <ref name="02322"> is unexpected.
Also, that ref name isn't re-used, so why was it added at all? Well, possibly because the same ref is present three times on that page now (#6 [used multiple times], #7, and #27). The problem may therefore be in the Re-use item.
It looks like <ref name=":02">, <ref name=":023"> ,<ref name=":0232"> and <ref name=":02322"> might all be related to each other and to this bug?
I haven't seen an other example recently, but I'm not monitoring VE edits, so I don't know
I've stumbled upon an other problem that looks quite similar, which happened today
A paragraph seems to have been cut and pasted later in the article: "Des articles virulents sont publiés dans la presse..." and reference which was named as :29 became named as :292 (as with the other case: similar name with just extra characters added).
We're investigating with the user, since my test showed a simple cut&paste doesn't lead to that result.
@Lfstevens has reported something very similar at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Uulh8h1z2mufkpp4