Will be merging this with T135475 to avoid too many reporting tasks.

@Danny_B, I can't add the Google-Summer-of-Code-2016 tag as the org admins are using it for the main tracking tasks only, i.e, tasks like T134721. Hence the [GSoC] in the title :P

In T15303#2173978, @Parent5446 wrote:

1. Have a single i18n message in plain text and then convert the message to HTML when needed. (This is the method @Galorefitz describes in T130490).

And in light of

In T127291#2150882, @Niharika wrote:

In T127291#2150557, @Qgil wrote:

Just a side comment about

In T129123#2147303, @01tonythomas wrote:

Since this proposal is valid for both GSoC and Outreachy, we are considering it for GSoC only, as per our rules at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/Admins#Proposal_submission_phase

I think the idea still is that candidates eligible to both programs should submit their applications to both, knowing that in the case of acceptance in both the priority is to get a slot in GSoC, not Outreachy. The idea to apply in both is still valid, because we should avoid a scenario where a student is not getting a GSoC project (i.e. because we get 5 slots and there are 7 good candidates) and then she is not getting an Outreachy project either, because we advised her not to apply.

You're right, my mistake. I was counting on the fact that we usually get the slots we ask for in GSoC.

In T130490#2151336, @Sumit wrote:

@Galorefitz a gentle reminder to submit your proposal as a final pdf at https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com before the application deadline, i.e, 25th March 17:00 UTC.

In T130490#2138290, @01tonythomas wrote:

Oops. Thank you for bringing this one up. I have added few more tags 'notifications', 'general' and 'web'. So probably 'notifications' ?

@01tonythomas yeah, I guess so.
@Parent5446 @01tonythomas any suggestions, clarifications, or comments on the proposal?

@01tonythomas When I was submitting my proposal to Google, they asked me for a proposal tag. Which tag will this project come under, operations or quality assurance?

@01tonythomas and @Parent5446 could you please review the submitted patch?

Hello! I am interested in working on this. By when will microtasks be posted for this project?

@01tonythomas @Parent5446 I am interested in working on this. By when will microtasks be listed for this project?

@Bawolff would you be willing to mentor this project for this round of GSoC/Outreachy?

@Tgr would you be willing to mentor this project for this round?
@Qgil @Ankitashukla @Spage any suggestions on who might be interested in mentoring this project for the upcoming GSoC/Outreachy rounds?

In T116277#1805830, @Tgr wrote:

You can view the text of a file in the browser without any use of the API. There is no reason the extension couldn't do the same.

In T116277#1802815, @Tgr wrote:

In T116277#1801664, @Galorefitz wrote:

It can be done using the conduit API method: diffusion.filecontentquery.

Using the API requires a token and is unlikely to be the simplest solution.

I am sorry for the late reply. I had some hardware issues with my laptop.

In T116277#1791799, @01tonythomas wrote:

We find that you are having university/school during the Outreachy round 11 internship period ( Dec 2015 - March 2016 ). Please fill in the answers for the following questsions too in your proposal description so that we stick to the Outreachy norms. Thank You!

https://wiki.gnome.org/Outreachy#Application_Form

Will you have any other time commitments, such as school work, exams, research, another job, planned vacation, etc., between December 7, 2015 and March 7, 2016? How many hours a week do these commitments take? If a student, please list the courses you will be taking between December 7, 2015 and March 7, 2016, how many credits you will be taking, and how many credits a full-time student normally takes at your school:

In T116277#1770884, @Tgr wrote:

Synopsis:

• It might be worth mentioning the structured data use case (e.g. pulling extension.json and providing the data therein to the wiki template that creates the extension infobox) since it might take some dedicated functionality to do that. Of course if you decide that does not fit into the roadmap that's fine.

There were two patches. The one for this bug is already submitted. I ended up submitting another one after that (the one that was for a different bug).

In T115206#1770258, @gerritbot wrote:

Change 250061 had a related patch set uploaded (by Galorefitz):
Remove mutliple wfEscapeShelArg() calls on $branch

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/250061

There is another error. The branch, when entered, gets escaped twice. Gonna submit a patch right now fixing the proxy issue. Cloning from local repos still doesn't work.

Git2Pages doesn't meet the current needs because: