Actually, my assumption above is wrong isn't it? We do want to include the title parameter in the template, and have it be independent of the page title, because it'll be translated. The page title will (I think?) always be in English, but could be different to the Wish Title either for clarity or translation purposes, and so there's no need for the intake form to worry about renaming the page if the Wish Title changes.

Actually, since a lot of people will see this new "login required" message, it might be wisest to wait until we get our first round of translations in. This should happen in a day or two, then I can proceed with deployment.

In T318036#8249060, @MusikAnimal wrote:

I think what I would like to do is have basically two thresholds -- one is the actual limit that can never be exceeded, and that's something really high like 800K edits. The other is the lower provisional limit that only requires you to login to proceed.

This no longer seems to be an issue.

Finally figured this out.

In T361147#9742408, @Volker_E wrote:

Was able to reproduce this on the Codex docs site with Safari Version 17.4.1 (19618.1.15.11.14), but it seems to be a browser bug.
When I uncheck the background-color property on the span carrying the check mark, while I'm inspecting the element, I can make the check mark appear again.

(Engineering notes)

I totally forgot to move to this to QA! It's already live on all wikis and has been for a week.

@ppelberg is away for a while (E1732) but I did consult the Editing team and there were no technical objections. It was mentioned that line numbering could be confusing to new users, but this is less of a concern right now that CodeMirror is not on by default. T359498 will also later provide a means for users to selectively toggle individual features as they so desire. When that time comes, communities can decide what the default features they want, and having CodeMirror on by default I think will be more realistic.

In T358804#9711347, @MusikAnimal wrote:

The <br> tag here is not being fully nested in the .cm-bidi-isolate span https://en-rtl.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Br&action=edit

This is possibly an issue with the parsing of apostrophes. If we do instead boldened syntax (no extraneous apostrophes), things look better. Definitely still a bug, I just don't know how common it will be, and it seems to sort of be an issue for LTR as well. T304567 may be related.

Unlicking this. I'm working on T362913 first which will ease development moving forward.

Barring objections, I'm just going to add a check for a minimum of 1,000 edits on the corresponding project. Someone like WizardGamer775 may have gotten there eventually, but there will always be outliers. A 1K edit requirement should shield us from most intentional disruption.

I was more thinking along the lines of the MediaWiki's browser support matrix, but I see now Grade A still includes Safari 11 which is too old. I shall change the examples back :) Thanks for flagging!

That's what I'm saying, async/await is not in ES6! It was added only in ES8 😄

In T361512#9725663, @Samwilson wrote:

This task is about internationalizing the intake form isn't it? … should this task stay scoped on the i18n of the form?

In T361465#9720984, @Bhsd wrote:

For instance,

this.$textarea[0].dispatchEvent(new Event('focus'));