Thanks for surfacing potential approaches @Nikerabbit!

@JWheeler-WMF I created an Epic ticket (T363306: Wish translation), connected the relevant tickets as sub-tasks, and created a ne ticket about the caching support (T363308: Server-side caching for MinT) based on recent conversations. Feel free to rearrange as it best works for you.

In T331023#9721915, @ngkountas wrote:

@Pginer-WMF the message inside the dialog according to the task description says:

After finishing a quick translation, you need to wait 10 min before initiating a new one. Please, review past work during this period, as high-quality content is valued by our editor community.

[Learn more]

However, since the waiting time can vary (depending on the translated paragraphs), do you think we should update the message to reflect that? In other words, should the message be "After finishing a quick translation, you need to wait 5 min before initiating a new one", if the count of translated paragraphs for the fast unreviewed translations is 5?

In T319280#9721938, @ngkountas wrote:

@Pginer-WMF since triggering the Captcha dialog in production is tricky, can we close this task based on the screenshots I took in my dev envinroment? These screenshots were also shared inside the related patch, and I'm sharing them here, too:

In T361514#9708572, @JWheeler-WMF wrote:

Hey @Pginer-WMF - yeah I think this makes sense to create as an Epic. I'm still not totally sure how to do that :)

In T353049#9712546, @Jklamo wrote:

The discussion was based on the real experiences of users and administrators. In my opinion, this is more meaningful than just analyzing statistics. Specifically, your statistics will only take into account the deletion of the article, not the low quality of the output, which requires extensive editing by experienced editors.

In T328107#9575915, @ngkountas wrote:

I used the test instance to translate with MinT a text with several numbers in it and the results show no numerals in latin being preserved. All text seem in the Odia script as the expected result. So I'll close the task, but @Jnanaranjan_sahu (or @abi_ ) if you have a chance feel free to take a quick look, and maybe you can confirm if there is anything I was missing since I'm not familiar with the script.

Punctuation marks seem to be using the correct characters when translating into Japanese now. I tried two text samples from English and Catalan in the test instance and only the expected symbols 、 or 。 appear, with no trace of the , or . symbols from the original texts that were incorrectly appearing in the translation before the fix:

Does it make sense for this to be the Epic ticket for the translation support for the new wishlist system?

We are keeping the task open until a new Wikipedia is created and we can check how this works in practice.