I'm generally in favor, especially when it comes to the subscribers. Torn with the project tags. There are some you most defenitly don't want to copy over, but some you most probably want to keep. 🤔

CI seems to be working again. See https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/mediawiki/extensions/Citoid/+/1020322

Just leaving a note here how weird the tests fail. It seems that only for the reuseRefs.cy.js file Citoid is not really loaded when executing the tests.

I also can not reproduce this issue. - What I did:

• I am logged in
• I have the ReferenceTooltips gadget disabled in my gadget settings ( otherwise ReferencePreviews won't show )
• I have ReferencePreviews enabled in my preferences https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering
• I visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_Me_Down_World?safemode=1 and hover a reference.
• Then I see the preview as expected

To get back to the original request here: The wish for a default version for "Reference Tooltips" is currently implemented as the Reference Previews feature. The code for the latter lives in the Cite extension now but depends on the Page-Previews extension to work. So both extensions would be needed.

Re-running the scripts is done. PM Review is handled in a different ticket.

Tests have been re-enabled for some time now and seem to be running fine. Feel free to re-open if you think there's some issue that remains.

I would consider this done. Not sure if we really want Zotero 🤔

This task seems a bit lost. Should it go anywhere or just be resolved? 🤔

Is there anything left to do, or should be close this ticket?

Seems like the activity tracking is not working for Citoid and also sets the feature to undefined

There will be a follow up to re run the scraper for the next sprint.

Does this ticket include scanning the available per-wiki summaries to get some data? Or should we have a re-run as a next step in any case? 🤔

Should be done. There are dummy templates to work with.

Note https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T357613#9759164 . From my perspective this covers the data points here as well.

Unblocked per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T357613#9759164 - would nice to prio this so we get data.

Unblocked per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T357613#9759164 - would nice to prio this so we get data.

In T362859#9747141, @awight wrote:

FWIW, I've been trying to add a simple line chart of editor interface popularity over time, but it's been unironically timing out.

In case anyone has thoughts:

SELECT year, month, wiki, event.editor_interface, count(1) as count
FROM event_sanitized.editattemptstep
where event.action = 'init'
group by year, month, wiki, event.editor_interface;

In T362859#9744426, @awight wrote:

Devs: it would be nice to get a second opinion on these SQL queries, especially some sanity checking of the way users and sessions are grouped.

Anybody feel free to grab this. I will not be able to work on this during the nest 2 1/2 weeks.

Thanks for reaching out and giving us the chance to handle this here.

Waiting for 1.43.0-wmf.3 deployment for the next steps.

@Raymond could you guide me in how to do this best? What would be most helpful?

In T361097#9741655, @WMDE-Fisch wrote:

We want to have a trend calculation from the different runs. Added it to the task.

Seems done for Move-Files-To-Commons with https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/991227

We want to have a trend calculation from the different runs. Added it to the task.

Still waiting for L3SC review ...