Page MenuHomePhabricator

Going back in time
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

Gentlemen, how could
12:49, 9 November 2007 Jidanni respond to
13:43, 9 October 2007 Ronline ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Taiwan-related_topics_notice_board#Romanisation
Isn't that going back in time?

Wacko in the signatures too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Taiwan-related_topics_notice_board&action=history

Imagine if an air traffic control had this problem...


Version: 1.12.x
Severity: normal

Details

Reference
bz11917

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 9:56 PM
bzimport set Reference to bz11917.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

(Oops, I put the first link second and the second first.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Taiwan-related_topics_notice_board&action=history

  1. (cur) (last) 05:49, 9 November 2007 Jidanni (Talk | contribs) m (9,214 bytes) (→Romanisation) (undo)
  2. (cur) (last) 05:49, 9 November 2007 Jidanni (Talk | contribs) (9,205 bytes) (→Romanisation) (undo)
  3. (cur) (last) 06:43, 9 October 2007 Ronline (Talk | contribs) (8,786 bytes) (→Romanisation - new section) (undo)

Looks ok to me. Watch the month: October -> November.