Page MenuHomePhabricator

Request for activating the WikiTimeLine extension on wikipedia or sister project
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

Author: echalone

Description:
I think it would be a good idea to activate the WikiTimeLine MediaWiki extension in wikipedia or one of its sister projects. Here's a short description:

The MediaWiki extension WikiTimeLine version 1.0 is now released. It displays events, people, and such on an interactive timeline. Its working with JavaScript (client side, so it doesn't put load on the server) and its pretty interactive (moving around, zooming, clicking on events on the timeline). If you add WikiTimeLine tags with a start and end date to an article, you'll get a link in that article, and if you click on that link you'll add the event to the timeline. So its totally real-time. Unlike easytimeline which is creating pictures when the article is created, WikiTimeLine is controlled by the reader of the article, not the writer. So everyone can put together their own timeline to see how things went in history. It also allows ongoing events (that have not yet stopped) and alternative begin or end dates.

I think this would be a great extension for Wikipedia or one of its sister projects. Any interest in that?

greetings,
Markus

PS: follow the link added to this message or any of these:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:WikiTimeLine
and
http://www.chaosreligion.com/wtl/index.php5?title=WikiTimeLine


Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement
URL: http://www.chaosreligion.com/wtl/index.php5?title=WikiTimeLine

Details

Reference
bz14988

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 10:13 PM
bzimport set Reference to bz14988.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

conrad.irwin wrote:

Extensions are generally not pushed onto projects, they are given when asked for. If you think Wikipedia would like this extension, ask Wikipedia - then, when Wikipedia has decided, they will ask here. That request should then be filed under Wikimedia not Mediawiki.

echalone wrote:

Huh, ok. Complex ;) Sorry if I took the wrong way, I'll go to wikipedia/wikimedia ;)