Page MenuHomePhabricator

Allow users to mark their own edits as "proposed" so they can be reviewed by others before being applied, but are then applied automatically after a configurable period of time
Open, Needs TriagePublicFeature

Description

Feature summary (what you would like to be able to do and where):
When editing, to be able to click an optional checkbox next to 'minor edit' before submitting an edit that makes it a 'proposed edit'. A 'proposed edit' differs from a normal edit in that it is not immediately applied and the submitter chooses a length of time for the proposal until it is automatically applied, from say 5 minutes to indefinitely. The 'proposed edit' shows up in the edit history like a normal edit, and other editors (probably just EC) can either revert it pre-emptively (giving a reason) or green light it to be immediately applied and bypass the timer (anyone can also revert the edit once it is applied, including if it was green lighted). The 3RR or 1RR would have to apply differently/ignore 'proposed edits'.

Use case(s) (list the steps that you performed to discover that problem, and describe the actual underlying problem which you want to solve. Do not describe only a solution):
I'm new to Wikipedia, most importantly this would address the issue of repelling/attracting new editors, which is critical to wikipedia's survival. It also can address the issue of edit warring somewhat. I thought of it when in conflict with another user after I made a bold controversial edit intending to follow WP:BRD.

Benefits (why should this be implemented?):
New editors unfamiliar with policy who generally feel uncertain and put off from editing can use this to gain confidence and seek approval for an edit, and the reasoning given by the reverter can be used to educate them about policy, facilitating master-student relationships on respective pages/topics.

This could become the convention for controversial edits, dismantling the binary of published and unpublished and offsetting the boldness, which can be received as an attack, reducing the chance of edit wars and polarised combative discussion, and encouraging collaboration.

This could also replace 'Protected edit requests' on CTs by making all non EC users' edits on these topics 'proposed edits' with an unlimited/indefinite timer.

Event Timeline

I have no idea what's going on, not at all tech literate sorry

Hi @Alexanderkowal, thanks for taking the time to report this and welcome to Wikimedia Phabricator!

To some extent this sounds like some parts of https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs (which is a nightmare to maintain). I expect a lot of additional complexity - who can see the not-yet-applied edit? If anyone can see it, how is this any different from the current situation/behavior of reverting?
This adds quite some additional technical complexity, is there social buy-in for this / has this been discussed on-wiki?

Pppery renamed this task from Proposed edits to Allow users to mark their own edits as "proposed" so they can be reviewed by others before being applied, but are then applied automatically after a configurable period of time.Sun, Jun 16, 11:26 PM
Pppery added a project: MediaWiki-Page-editing.

Hi, one of the things that inflame edit wars is the binary between published and unpublished. If someone makes an edit that they feel corrects a grave injustice and it is published, they have achieved their goal. If someone reverts that and makes it unpublished, they would receive it as regression and likely respond angrily. Encouraging the use of proposed edits for controversial edits means that that editor has to work with the reverter in order to achieve their goal of getting the edit published, and the process is one constant progression.

Sorry I don't understand what flagged revs is. Anyone can see a proposed edit in the edit history (maybe just EC users) and there's just two buttons they can click: revert and support. A little number could show up on 'View history' that you click to view edit history and this could refer to the number of proposed edits that haven't been actioned (like the number that shows up on the 'Your notices' icon in the top right.

It was discussed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Proposed_edits_feature

So was flagged revs giving some users rights to mass revert back to a previous rev? I still don't think I get it lol. Apparently the German wikipedia uses proposed edits unilaterally for new editors, so you might be able to copy that and put it behind a checkbox? The edit history shenanigans may be more technically complex