Page MenuHomePhabricator

timestamps are either not reliable or not properly set up
Closed, InvalidPublic

Description

Author: gangleri

Description:
Hallo!

Accurat and universal time stamps are quite important especially in a case like
elections for the board.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elections_for_the_Board_of_Trustees_of_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%2C_2005/En&direction=next&oldid=168960
shows the timestamp as

< Elections for the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, 2005
Revision as of 05:55, July 13, 2005; view current revision
←Older revision | Newer revision→

The message itself contains
09:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Election Officials, Wikimedia Election Committee

My note there has the timestamp

  • I thing that more care should be payed to these issues especially in a case

like these elections. Please compare also with the timestamp of this note. Best
regards Gangleri | Th | T 21:20, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Please comment at that page. Thanks in advance!

Best regards Reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]


Version: unspecified
Severity: major
OS: Windows XP
Platform: PC
URL: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elections_for_the_Board_of_Trustees_of_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%2C_2005/En#time_stamps

Details

Reference
bz2860

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 8:42 PM
bzimport set Reference to bz2860.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

So, somebody signed it with ~~~~ a month previously. So what?