In T358095#9673868, @CMyrick-WMF wrote:

Message from the project mentors about the final application

In response to questions we've received about the final application related to the timeline question, the "date contribution was accepted or merged", and the "community-related questions":

• For information related to the timeline question, please see my previous message.
• Date contribution was accepted or merged: you may use the date you received initial feedback from us on your notebook, or the date you submitted your final notebook to us.
• Community-specific questions: there are no community-specific questions for our project's application.

In T358095#9670345, @GonzaGertrude wrote:

In T358095#9670338, @Pratham_Kandari wrote:

In T358095#9669653, @Chimaobichisom65 wrote:

Where should the notebook be submitted?

Hey, it has to be submitted to the project mentors via mail.

Isn't it passed the deadline for feedback? The person can register it as a contribution in the outreachy website.

In T358095#9669653, @Chimaobichisom65 wrote:

Where should the notebook be submitted?

In T358095#9661484, @Pablo wrote:

Message from the project mentors regarding generative AI

In the process of providing feedback to applicants we have found some notebooks with very similar responses to specific to-dos. Their style resembles that generated by AI tools such as ChatGPT. We believe that these tools can be useful in some specific cases (e.g., proofreading for non-native speakers of English). However, if AI tools are used, the final notebook must clearly indicate where and for what purpose.

In T358095#9617225, @praptijaduvanshi wrote:

Also, I’m a little unclear about what the first task is asking us to do. We need to use the API to return views for revision_timestamps? For every article? Or?
I mean what is the output going to be here.

Hello Everyone, my name is Pratham and I am a outreach applicant. Just started reading about the project. Excited to contribute to this project.