Hello Mentors,

In T358095#9661028, @Iprincyy wrote:

@Mistura14 how many contributions did you make

In T358095#9661010, @Mistura14 wrote:

Please how do we go about recording the contribution and submitting a final application

Just to make sure, the first task is to do the view count for revision timestamps, and the second task is to use the API with smaller granularity and create data visualizations of the feature value and scores.

Also, I’m a little unclear about what the first task is asking us to do. We need to use the API to return views for revision_timestamps? For every article? Or?
I mean what is the output going to be here.

In T358095#9615283, @CMyrick-WMF wrote:

Message from the project mentors: How will we judge applicants?

It's common for folks to ask us how to make a strong application for this project. The task is open-ended so there is no one "right" answer, but we'll try to give you a bit more guidance. The final notebook (created for the microtask) is our primary means of judging each applicant. For the notebook, we will evaluate it along a few criteria:

• Quality of code: are there bugs? is your code well-structured, commented, and easy to understand?
• Quality of notebook: is the notebook well-structured and easy to follow?
• Creativity: did you try different approaches? did you come up with interesting ideas for future analyses?
• Iteration: if you receive feedback, were you able to incorporate those changes?

NOTE: because we will likely only provide one round of feedback for each applicant, we recommend submitting the notebook when you are fairly confident it is a complete state. As noted above, you are not evaluated on the quality of your initial notebook but rather how you adapt to the feedback so it's okay to have mistakes, etc., in your notebook in the initial review and you will not be penalized for that.

Hello everyone, my name is Prapti. I'm an Outreachy applicant from India. I'd love to get started and make contributions to this project.