#### Background
As we prepare for the Alt Text experiment, we want to observe how users interact with the prototypes and surface feedback and opportunities.
**Testing groups:**
- Experiment Group B: Add an image flow, and then dedicated Alt Text flow after
- Experiment Group C: Text edit in section with image, and then encouragement to add alt-text to that image after publishing
####Research Questions
- (B only) Why might users skip adding alt text asAfter image-related edit is submitted, do they understand they go through Iare adding alt-text to the image Recommendationsthey just added?
- (B- (C only) After non-image- related edit is submitted, how do they feel about beunderstand they are making asked new edit to complete a follow-up taskthe same article?
- (C only)After non-image related edit is submitted, - Are the tooltips sufficiently helpful?
how d- Do they feel about being asked to complete a follow-up taskunderstand the alt text guidance?
- Do they read and understand the alt textknow where to go to get additional guidance?
- Are the users able to get sufficient information from the image to write the alt text?
- How often do- Are the users minimize half sheet vs click View Aable to adequately get contextual information from the article for more informationto add alt-text to the image ?
- Where/when are- Do they know how to zoom on the image?
- Do they trying to zoom or open the imageunderstand when they are previewing vs when it has been published?
- Is there anything they'd change about the feature?
#### Target Audience
- [ ] Folks in the Americas & Caribbean
- [ ] Test in Primarily ES, PT, Nice to have: FR, ZH
- [ ] There should be diversity in Gender and Age
- [ ] Low Bandwidth users
- [ ] Blind and Low Vision Users / Accessibility Experts
#### Link to protocol
TBA @OTichonova
#### Results
TBA @GLima-WMF
#### Recommendations
TBA @GLima-WMF
-------------
References: [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/18HQW_dc-TcBGWu-Y8WRkZTqcsckbfWJQxCru1EiURpI/edit | Prototype Protocol ]]