This task involves the work within consulting with volunteers to learn how they can imagine people acting in bad faith exploiting Edit Check to vandalize Wikipedia and/or disrupt/harm the people who are contributing to it in good faith.
=== Decision(s) to be made
//This consultation this task is describing is intended to help the Editing Team decide the following...//
- [ ] 1. What – if any – changes need to be made to the Edit Check user experience in order to //decrease// the likelihood that people acting in bad faith could use it to vandalize Wikipedia and/or disrupt/harm the people who are contributing to it in good faith.
=== Requirements
**Consultation Audiences**
- Patrollers/Reviewers interested in solutions designed to increase the quality of edits and as a result, increase their capacity to think about more complex/high impact moderation challenges interested in solutions designed to increase the quality of edits and as a result, increase their capacity to think about more complex/high impact moderation challenges
- Gadget and Script Authors interested in helping to shape a new tool being designed to proactively educate and guide newcomers to make changes they feel proud of and changes that improve Wikipedia
**Learning Objectives**
1. How can experienced volunteers, who are practiced with patrolling for vandalism, imagine people acting in bad faith exploiting Edit Check to vandalize Wikipedia and/or harm the people who contribute to it in good faith?
2. //TBD//
=== Mockups
//@nayoub to add mockups for volunteers to review.//
=== Findings
|Description|Scenario|Mitigation strategy|Ticket|Notes
|---|---|---|---|---
|1.|"Re-use" a reference already present on the page to disguise a vandalistic contribution|Remove the "Re-use" tab the Edit Check "add citation" workflow| | @Skb named this scenario in the [3 March 2023 Editing Team Community Conversation](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Editing_team/Community_Conversations#3_March_2023)