# Background
As part of the [[ https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making | Technical Decision Making Process ]], phase 3 is defined as "Get feedback from the Decision Forum". Specifically:
> Once the problem statement is finalized, the Technical Decision Forum Representatives will review the problem statement and provides feedback to the decision team. Forum Representatives are expected to share their feedback within one week. The feedback answers these questions:
>
> Is the problem statement correct?
> Is it clear how solving this problem supports Wikimedia goals (movement strategy, medium term plan, annual plan, etc.)?
> Are these the right stakeholders?
> Is the needed subject matter expertise to make a decision reflected accurately? Are the right groups outlined in the problem statement?
> The Forum project manager is responsible for requesting review from Forum members and sharing Forum feedback with the project owner.
# Description
This ticket will cover gathering this feedback, summarizing it and creating relevant tickets in preparation for the prototype phase.
# Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Work with the Technical Decision Forum Project Manager to distribute the survey to all relevant participants
- [ ] Collect all survey responses and summarize themes in this ticket. Specifically:
- [ ] Determine which responses are in and out of scope, and respond back with reasoning here
- [ ] What solutions have been proposed that we should prototype?
- [ ] What questions have been raised that need answering?
- [ ] Write a decision record that summarizes these conversations -- examples [here](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_decision_making/Decision_records)
- [ ] For those proposals which are in scope, create Phabricator tickets for prototypes to create, and create spikes for open questions that need answering. Make these subtasks of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T333878