Change Details

=== Test goals To learn whether the current design leads Junior Contributors to be able to intuitively: - Format the content of the comment they are writing - Ping/@ mention another user. Scenarios: -- Ping someone who has commented in the discussion the tester is commenting in -- Ping someone who has commented in a different discussion on the talk page the tester is commenting on -- Ping someone who has not commented on the talk page the tester is commenting on - Insert a link into the comment they are writing - Know how they will be made aware when someone responds to something they've said === Done - [ ] Run test - [ ] Document test findings and recommendations on ticket

This task represents the work involved with evaluating the usability of Version 2.0 of the Reply tool with people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. This task is a a follow up to the usability test we ran with Version 1.0 of the Reply tool. - v1.0 usability test script: [Usability test of Reply v1.0](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zaCdZDnlgwmzi93rRC8xu9DQJEG_0kfgfDWVhzBySQ/edit#heading=h.gho4hntcrsko) - v1.0 usability test findings: [Version_1.0_prototype](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk_pages_project/replying#Version_1.0_prototype_(usertesting.com)) === Test goals - To understand whether the new features introduced in version 2.0 of the Replying tool are intuitive for people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. - To understand whether the Reply tool as a whole is intuitive for people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. - To identify parts of the Replying tool that could be improved to make it easier for people to start using and to complete what they set out to accomplish. === Test details - **Platforms:** desktop - **Account type:** logged in and logged out - **Default text input:** `source` and `visual` -- Meaning: one round of tests should land people in the Reply tool's `source` mode; one round of tests should land people in the Reply tool's `visual` mode. === Workflow to test In addition the Reply tool's core workflows (e.g. draft and publish a response in that discussion, locate published response on the talk page), we would like to test these new workflows Version 2.0 is introducing: - Style the content of the comment they are writing (e.g. bold and italicize). - Ping another user. Scenarios: -- Ping someone who has commented in the discussion the tester is commenting in -- Ping someone who has commented in a different discussion on the talk page the tester is commenting on -- Ping someone who has not commented on the talk page the tester is commenting on - Change the user the tester had selected to ping, to a different user -- //Read: if they initially had selected `USER A` to ping have them ping `USER B`// - Delete the ping they had entered into the text input - Insert a link to another Wikipedia page into the comment they are writing - Be made aware when someone responds to something they've said === Test script //To be added by @iamjessklein// === Done - [ ] Draft test script - [ ] Run test - [ ] Document test findings and recommendations on ticket, complete with standout quotes and links to the parts of the tests where the quotes occur.

This task represents the work involved with evaluating the usability of Version 2.0 of the Reply tool with people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. This task is a a follow up to the usability test we ran with Version 1.0 of the Reply tool. - v1.0 usability test script: [Usability test of Reply v1.0](https://docs.google.com/document/d/12zaCdZDnlgwmzi93rRC8xu9DQJEG_0kfgfDWVhzBySQ/edit#heading=h.gho4hntcrsko) - v1.0 usability test findings: [Version_1.0_prototype](https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk_pages_project/replying#Version_1.0_prototype_(usertesting.com)) === Test goals To learn whether the current design leads Junior Contributors to be able to intuitively:- To understand whether the new features introduced in version 2.0 of the Replying tool are intuitive for people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. - To understand whether the Reply tool as a whole is intuitive for people who have little-to-no-experience using Wikipedia talk pages. - To identify parts of the Replying tool that could be improved to make it easier for people to start using and to complete what they set out to accomplish. === Test details - **Platforms:** desktop - **Account type:** logged in and logged out - **Default text input:** `source` and `visual` -- Meaning: one round of tests should land people in the Reply tool's `source` mode; one round of tests should land people in the Reply tool's `visual` mode. === Workflow to test - Format the content of the comment they are writingIn addition the Reply tool's core workflows (e.g. draft and publish a response in that discussion, locate published response on the talk page), we would like to test these new workflows Version 2.0 is introducing: - Ping/@ mention- Style the content of the comment they are writing (e.g. bold and italicize). - Ping another user. Scenarios: -- Ping someone who has commented in the discussion the tester is commenting in -- Ping someone who has commented in a different discussion on the talk page the tester is commenting on -- Ping someone who has not commented on the talk page the tester is commenting on - Insert a link into the comment they are writing- Change the user the tester had selected to ping, to a different user - Know how they will b- //Read: if they initially had selected `USER A` to ping have them ping `USER B`// - Delete the ping they had entered into the text input - Insert a link to another Wikipedia page into the comment they are writing - Be made aware when someone responds to something they've said === Test script //To be added by @iamjessklein// === Done - [ ] Draft test script - [ ] Run test - [ ] Document test findings and recommendations on ticket , complete with standout quotes and links to the parts of the tests where the quotes occur.