Change Details

This task involves the work of conducting an //initial// round of usability tests of the first edit check we are developing: a check that prompts people to explicitly decide whether the new content they are attempting to add warrants a reference or not (design work is happening in T325711). === Decisions to be made - [ ] What – if any – aspects of the proposed //mobile// reference check user experience (T325711) will we revise prior to investing in implementing these designs in code and subsequently, inviting volunteers to experiment with using in a production or production-like environment? === Learning Objectives/Research Questions 1. What ambiguities/points of confusion/holes/etc. do people encounter when attempting to navigate the reference check experience. -- //Where "attempting to navigate" in this context refers to doing things like:// --- Knowing what they are being asked to decide --- Knowing what content they are being asked make a decision about ---- Choosing **not** to add a citation to the content they are being asked about ---- Choosing **to** add a citation to the content they are being asked about ----- //Generating// a citation ----- //Inserting// said citation --- Proceeding to publish the edit they will have just "finished" making --- Moving "forward" and "backward" within the edit flow ---- //E.g. "Say you notice a typo while deciding whether the content you're adding warrants a reference or not. How would you intuitively think to go back to edit this text?"// === Test protocol !!@nayoub to draft!! === Recruitment filters !!@nayoub and @ppelberg to decide and document!! === Findings //This section will eventually contain a synthesis of what we learned through conducting these usability tests.// |Finding|Description|Resulting action (if any) |---|---|--- === Done - [ ] Usability tests are run - [ ] Findings are documented on this ticket - [ ] Findings are published on mediawiki.org: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check

This task involves the work of conducting an //initial// round of usability tests of the first edit check we are developing: a check that prompts people to explicitly decide whether the new content they are attempting to add warrants a reference or not (design work is happening in T325711). === Decisions to be made - [ ] What – if any – aspects of the proposed //mobile// reference check user experience (T325711) will we revise prior to investing in implementing these designs in code and subsequently, inviting volunteers to experiment with using in a production or production-like environment? === Learning Objectives/Research Questions 1. What ambiguities/points of confusion/holes/etc. do people encounter when attempting to navigate the reference check experience. -- //Where "attempting to navigate" in this context refers to doing things like:// --- Knowing what they are being asked to decide --- Knowing what content they are being asked make a decision about ---- Choosing **not** to add a citation to the content they are being asked about ---- Choosing **to** add a citation to the content they are being asked about ----- //Generating// a citation ----- //Inserting// said citation --- Proceeding to publish the edit they will have just "finished" making --- Moving "forward" and "backward" within the edit flow ---- //E.g. "Say you notice a typo while deciding whether the content you're adding warrants a reference or not. How would you intuitively think to go back to edit this text?"// === Test protocol !!@nayoub to draft!! === Recruitment filters **Test #1** - People who: -- Read Wikipedia with some regularity (e.g. monthly/weekly) -- Speak English as a //second// language -- Living in/from a non-Western context (e.g. outside of Norther America, Canada, UK, Australia) -- Have //some// experienced editing Wikipedia **Test #2** - People who: -- Read Wikipedia with some regularity (e.g. monthly/weekly) -- Speak English as a //second// language -- Living in/from a non-Western context (e.g. outside of Norther America, Canada, UK, Australia) -- Do //NOT// have experience editing Wikipedia === Findings //This section will eventually contain a synthesis of what we learned through conducting these usability tests.// |Finding|Description|Resulting action (if any) |---|---|--- === Done - [ ] Usability tests are run - [ ] Findings are documented on this ticket - [ ] Findings are published on mediawiki.org: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check

This task involves the work of conducting an //initial// round of usability tests of the first edit check we are developing: a check that prompts people to explicitly decide whether the new content they are attempting to add warrants a reference or not (design work is happening in T325711). === Decisions to be made - [ ] What – if any – aspects of the proposed //mobile// reference check user experience (T325711) will we revise prior to investing in implementing these designs in code and subsequently, inviting volunteers to experiment with using in a production or production-like environment? === Learning Objectives/Research Questions 1. What ambiguities/points of confusion/holes/etc. do people encounter when attempting to navigate the reference check experience. -- //Where "attempting to navigate" in this context refers to doing things like:// --- Knowing what they are being asked to decide --- Knowing what content they are being asked make a decision about ---- Choosing **not** to add a citation to the content they are being asked about ---- Choosing **to** add a citation to the content they are being asked about ----- //Generating// a citation ----- //Inserting// said citation --- Proceeding to publish the edit they will have just "finished" making --- Moving "forward" and "backward" within the edit flow ---- //E.g. "Say you notice a typo while deciding whether the content you're adding warrants a reference or not. How would you intuitively think to go back to edit this text?"// === Test protocol !!@nayoub to draft!! === Recruitment filters !!@nayoub and @ppelberg to decide and document!!**Test #1** - People who: -- Read Wikipedia with some regularity (e.g. monthly/weekly) -- Speak English as a //second// language -- Living in/from a non-Western context (e.g. outside of Norther America, Canada, UK, Australia) -- Have //some// experienced editing Wikipedia **Test #2** - People who: -- Read Wikipedia with some regularity (e.g. monthly/weekly) -- Speak English as a //second// language -- Living in/from a non-Western context (e.g. outside of Norther America, Canada, UK, Australia) -- Do //NOT// have experience editing Wikipedia === Findings //This section will eventually contain a synthesis of what we learned through conducting these usability tests.// |Finding|Description|Resulting action (if any) |---|---|--- === Done - [ ] Usability tests are run - [ ] Findings are documented on this ticket - [ ] Findings are published on mediawiki.org: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Edit_check