Change Details

For a few days (it was reported yesterday) in Latvian Wikipedia template:merge doesn't look right. [[ https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandrs_IV | Example ]] {F18043742} It should look more or less like at enwiki. Nothing (common.js, common.css, ambox template, the template itself) has been changed (the template system is more or less the same as in enwiki). Few weeks ago we have screewed up formatting for hlist class (no word/white-space wrapping), but problem went away after a day or so. Again, nobody changed nothing at lvwiki side. It would be nice to at least know what the reason could be in general, if not for these two particular cases.

For a few days (it was reported yesterday) in Latvian Wikipedia template:merge doesn't look right. [[ https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandrs_IV | Example ]] {F18043742} It should look more or less like at enwiki. Nothing (common.js, common.css, ambox template, the template itself) has been changed (the template system is more or less the same as in enwiki). Few weeks ago we had screwed up formatting for hlist class (no word/white-space wrapping), but problem went away after a day or so. Again, nobody changed nothing at lvwiki side. It would be nice to at least know what the reason could be in general, if not for these two particular cases.

For a few days (it was reported yesterday) in Latvian Wikipedia template:merge doesn't look right. [[ https://lv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandrs_IV | Example ]] {F18043742} It should look more or less like at enwiki. Nothing (common.js, common.css, ambox template, the template itself) has been changed (the template system is more or less the same as in enwiki). Few weeks ago we havehad screewed up formatting for hlist class (no word/white-space wrapping), but problem went away after a day or so. Again, nobody changed nothing at lvwiki side. It would be nice to at least know what the reason could be in general, if not for these two particular cases.