Change Details

**Steps to replicate the issue** (include links if applicable): * Editors with access to TWL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library) can read paywalled articles. They get a link with „wikipedialibrary“ in it, which is not accessible for the public * example: https://www-sciencedirect-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S014067362201474X?via%3Dihub * VE Citation Tool can‘t handle these links, see screenshot **What happens?**: Contributions are made without proper sourcing, or abandoned alltogether. Or the TWL links are added manually (several hundreds in dewiki up to today), being of no use to our readers. **What should have happened instead?**: CT should recognize TWL links and change them to the original, or to a DOI. In my example this would be https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01474-X/ , or https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01474-X **Software version** (skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia): **Other information** (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.): {F35573431} (apologies for German language in the screenshot)

**Steps to replicate the issue** (include links if applicable): * Editors with access to TWL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library) can read paywalled articles. They get a link with „wikipedialibrary“ in it, which is not accessible for the public * example: https://www-sciencedirect-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S014067362201474X?via%3Dihub * VE Citation Tool can‘t handle these links, see screenshot **What happens?**: Contributions are made without proper sourcing, or abandoned alltogether. Or the TWL links are added manually (several hundreds in dewiki up to today), being of no use to our readers. Dewiki is currently pondering to block new TWL links by edit filtering, which might be a really bad solution. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administratoren/Anfragen#wikipedialibrary_im_ANR_jetzt_blocken (dewiki‘s sysop board, German language). **What should have happened instead?**: CT should recognize TWL links and change them to the original, or to a DOI. In my example this would be https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01474-X/ , or https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01474-X **Software version** (skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia): **Other information** (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.): {F35573431} (apologies for German language in the screenshot)

**Steps to replicate the issue** (include links if applicable): * Editors with access to TWL (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library) can read paywalled articles. They get a link with „wikipedialibrary“ in it, which is not accessible for the public * example: https://www-sciencedirect-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S014067362201474X?via%3Dihub * VE Citation Tool can‘t handle these links, see screenshot **What happens?**: Contributions are made without proper sourcing, or abandoned alltogether. Or the TWL links are added manually (several hundreds in dewiki up to today), being of no use to our readers. Dewiki is currently pondering to block new TWL links by edit filtering, which might be a really bad solution. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administratoren/Anfragen#wikipedialibrary_im_ANR_jetzt_blocken (dewiki‘s sysop board, German language). **What should have happened instead?**: CT should recognize TWL links and change them to the original, or to a DOI. In my example this would be https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01474-X/ , or https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01474-X **Software version** (skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia): **Other information** (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.): {F35573431} (apologies for German language in the screenshot)