Change Details

We originally deemed security & performance reviews to be [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qj9X3ihkIELk5AHIqStPfjURquEBIHui97qjrkPvi_Q/edit | out-of-scope for Campaigns v0 ]], since we are only deploying v0 to betawiki. However, in chatting with @cmelo, he brought up a good point that since these reviews take a while, it may be more efficient to have the first round done for v0, and then another round for when we are releasing MVP to production, instead of waiting until the end of MVP. What are your thoughts on that @ifried @ldelench_wmf ? Related to T290248

Security & performance reviews were deemed to be [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qj9X3ihkIELk5AHIqStPfjURquEBIHui97qjrkPvi_Q/edit | out-of-scope for Campaigns v0 ]], but we would like to get them done as soon as v0 is ready to be reviewed. Tasks: - security review - ✅ ticket opened: T290248 - ⏳ ready for review - performance review - ✅ ticket opened: T302858 - ⏳ ready for review

We originally deemed sSecurity & performance reviews were deemed to be [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qj9X3ihkIELk5AHIqStPfjURquEBIHui97qjrkPvi_Q/edit | out-of-scope for Campaigns v0 ]], since we are only deploying v0 to betawiki. However, in chatting with @cmelo, he brought up a good point that since these reviews take a while, it may be more efficient to have the first round done for v0, and then another round for when we are releasing MVP to production, instead of waiting until the end of MVP. What are your thoughts on that @ifried @ldelench_wmf ?but we would like to get them done as soon as v0 is ready to be reviewed. Related to T290248Tasks: - security review - ✅ ticket opened: T290248 - ⏳ ready for review - performance review - ✅ ticket opened: T302858 - ⏳ ready for review