Change Details

The old Wikimedia blog at https://blog.wikimedia.org/ was licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license. This allowed posts to be republished in a number of places, including on Wikipedia as part of The Signpost. The new blog at https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/ is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, which is a more restrictive licence, and incompatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence. Can the new blog's posts have a more permissive licence (either in addition to or instead of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence) that would be compatible with Wikipedia, such as the old blog's CC-BY 3.0? Or perhaps CC-BY-SA 3.0 if the share alike restriction is deemed important.

The old Wikimedia blog at https://blog.wikimedia.org/ was licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license. This allowed posts to be republished in a number of places, including on Wikipedia as part of The Signpost. The new blog at https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/ is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, which is a more restrictive licence, and incompatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copying_text_from_other_sources#Can_I_copy_from_open_license_or_public_domain_sources?|Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources]]). Can the new blog's posts have a more permissive licence (either in addition to or instead of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence) that would be compatible with Wikipedia, such as the old blog's CC-BY 3.0? Or perhaps CC-BY-SA 3.0 if the share alike restriction is deemed important.

The old Wikimedia blog at https://blog.wikimedia.org/ was licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported license. This allowed posts to be republished in a number of places, including on Wikipedia as part of The Signpost. The new blog at https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/ is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, which is a more restrictive licence, and incompatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copying_text_from_other_sources#Can_I_copy_from_open_license_or_public_domain_sources?|Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources]]). Can the new blog's posts have a more permissive licence (either in addition to or instead of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 licence) that would be compatible with Wikipedia, such as the old blog's CC-BY 3.0? Or perhaps CC-BY-SA 3.0 if the share alike restriction is deemed important.