Rate article/subject importance.
You give it an article and it tells you how important that article probably is to wikipedia, generally.
(optional) You give it an article and a WikiProject and it tells you how important it thinks that article is to the specified WikiProject.
**Wiki thing it helps with:**
* SuggestBot could better help editors find the most impactful things to work on.
* We could take better measurements of productivity in Wikipedia: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Measuring_value-added
* We can sort lists of work on Wikipedia by importance
* We might be able to recommend articles to WikiProjects
** Things that might helps us get this AI built (optional): **
* Domain-specific datasets about importance (e.g. list of biographies)
* If a way is found to automatically extract relevant "keywords" or topics from a Wikiproject, a similarity measure between those and the article could be a reasonable metric for importance of article to that Wikiproject.
* Maybe something like topic modelling on a Wikiproject for above ^ as an idea.
* Wikipedians label importance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Importance_of_topic
* Views and links seem like good proxies for article importance: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Measuring_article_importance
* You can get pageview rates from an API: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/PageviewAPI
* You can get links from tha pagelinks table: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Pagelinks_table
* You and query tables with Quarry: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/
* Wikiprojects label importance independently. E.g https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waffle is Top-importance for WikiProject Breakfast, but only High-importance for WikiProject food and drink.
* Maybe we can use within-WikiProject link stats and within WikiProject view rates to model that more accurately.
**Wiki Project page:**
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Automated_classification_of_article_importance