Change Details

For Wikimedia Wikis, on the `centralauth` table lives the `oathauth_users` table which stores very sensitive data. I am proposing to add a note such as I did for fa9e5ecb11d6 to note it is deliberately excluded. For sure we don't want anyone to know who has or has not 2FA enabled, let alone the scratch codes... Note: it is not being replicated of course, but I prefer to err on the side of caution. If you deem this is unnecessary I can understand.

For Wikimedia Wikis, on the `centralauth` table lives the `oathauth_users` table which stores very sensitive data. I am proposing to add a note such as I did for fa9e5ecb11d6 to note it is deliberately excluded. For sure we don't want anyone to know who has or has not 2FA enabled, let alone the scratch codes... Note: as you can see at https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/34258 the table displayed. I don't know if it is however being replicated but not displayed. We should check that too.

For Wikimedia Wikis, on the `centralauth` table lives the `oathauth_users` table which stores very sensitive data. I am proposing to add a note such as I did for fa9e5ecb11d6 to note it is deliberately excluded. For sure we don't want anyone to know who has or has not 2FA enabled, let alone the scratch codes... Note: it is not being replicated of course,as you can see at https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/34258 the table displayed. but I prefer to err on the side of cautionI don't know if it is however being replicated but not displayed. If you deem this is unnecessary I can understandWe should check that too.