Change Details

This task about adding feedback to the New Discussion Tool that causes people to know the following when they attempt to publish a new discussion topic //without// having added any text to the tool's `Topic` field: 1. The `Topic` field is empty 2. In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss === Behavior 1. Open the New Discussion Tool 2. Enter some text in the tool's `Description` field 3. Click the `Add topic` button **Existing** 4. ❗️Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section **Desired** 4. ✅Notice feedback [of some kind] causes people to know: -- The `Topic` field is empty -- In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss 5. ✅Click `Add topic` button 6. ✅ Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section === Approach //TBD; @iamjessklein to decide.// === Background In T243248#6514134, we decided to initially implement soft vs. hard validation. Thank you to @Tacsipacsi for mentioned this missing soft validation in T267595#6663423. === Done - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is decided upon - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is implemented

This task about adding feedback to the New Discussion Tool that causes people to easily become aware of the following when they attempt to publish a new discussion topic //without// having added any text to the tool's `Topic` field: 1. The `Topic` field is empty 2. In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss === Behavior 1. Open the New Discussion Tool 2. Enter some text in the tool's `Description` field 3. Click the `Add topic` button **Existing** 4. ❗️Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section **Desired** 4. ✅Notice feedback [of some kind] causes people to know: -- The `Topic` field is empty -- In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss 5. ✅Click `Add topic` button 6. ✅ Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section === Approach //TBD; @iamjessklein to decide.// === Background In T243248#6514134, we decided to initially implement soft vs. hard validation. Thank you to @Tacsipacsi for mentioned this missing soft validation in T267595#6663423. === Done - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is decided upon - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is implemented

This task about adding feedback to the New Discussion Tool that causes people to knoweasily become aware of the following when they attempt to publish a new discussion topic //without// having added any text to the tool's `Topic` field: 1. The `Topic` field is empty 2. In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss === Behavior 1. Open the New Discussion Tool 2. Enter some text in the tool's `Description` field 3. Click the `Add topic` button **Existing** 4. ❗️Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section **Desired** 4. ✅Notice feedback [of some kind] causes people to know: -- The `Topic` field is empty -- In most cases, the topic field should contain a title for the topic the author is wanting/trying to discuss 5. ✅Click `Add topic` button 6. ✅ Notice what you wrote in "Step 2." is published to the talk page and placed //within// the bottom-most section === Approach //TBD; @iamjessklein to decide.// === Background In T243248#6514134, we decided to initially implement soft vs. hard validation. Thank you to @Tacsipacsi for mentioned this missing soft validation in T267595#6663423. === Done - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is decided upon - [ ] An "Approach" for the "Desired" behavior is implemented