T331080 will make it possible for the Editing Team to observe how the sentence splitting work we've done in T324363 performs on Wikipedia articles published on production wikis.
This task involves the work of evaluating said "performance."
=== Decisions to be made
//Answering the "Open questions" below will help the Editing Team decide the following...//
- [ ] `D1`: What – if any – revisions will the Editing Team need to make to the assumption that "Edit Check will automatically be able to place references at the end of a sentence that someone has added"?
=== Open Questions
- [ ] 1. Can the approach T324363 implements effectively find the end of sentences across languages?
- [ ] 2. How do things "look" in ambiguous cases where there is a possible, but not certain, end of a sentence?
-- //Note: knowing the answer to the above will help us to identify potential patterns that unify/explain cases where the sentence splitting/detection is not working as expected.//
=== Requirements
Use the bookmarklet T324363 introduces in a range of languages and document the cases where the sentence detection method T324363 implements //fails// to detect the end of a sentence.
- Where "range of languages" in this context means one of each of the following languages:
-- Notable linguistic features
--- [] [Bangla](https://unicode.org/faq/bengali.html#10) (unique full-stop punctuation)
--- [] [Armenian](https://unicodeplus.com/U+0589) (unique full-stop punctuation)
--- [] German (prevalence of abbreviations, noun capitalization)
-- Orientations
--- LTR language
---- [] .
--- RTL language
---- [] .
-- Scripts/Alphabets
--- Arabic
---- [] Arabic
--- Chinese logographies
---- [] .
--- Cyrillic
---- [] .
--- Indic
---- [] .
--- Kanji
---- [] Chinese
---- [] Japanese
--- Latin
---- [] .
=== Findings
//TBD//