Page MenuHomePhabricator

Review your annotation changes
Open, MediumPublic

Assigned To
None
Authored By
Prtksxna
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
Referenced Files
F4826497: 4review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826490: 7review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826488: 8review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826498: 1review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826486: 6review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826494: 5review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826491: 2review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM
F4826489: 3review.png
Nov 23 2016, 10:09 AM

Description

Henry goes back to complete the annotation of the "Stahl House" images to annotate all furniture. Henry connects parts of the image with existing pictures, articles, and more resources. When those are not available, he provides also some information he knows about the furniture. He is able to review that the annotations are correct and they are in the right place. It is easy to adjust those that are not.


WARNING: The table below is not really a table, just saving vertical space
1review.png (912×950 px, 1 MB)
2review.png (912×950 px, 1 MB)
3review.png (684×839 px, 768 KB)
4review.png (644×867 px, 706 KB)
5review.png (727×858 px, 774 KB)
6review.png (414×486 px, 40 KB)
7review.png (644×864 px, 722 KB)
8review.png (634×855 px, 560 KB)
Blank

Axes

  • Atomic change vs. immersive mode

Hypotheses

Event Timeline

MarkTraceur moved this task from Untriaged to Next up on the Multimedia board.

I agree that 5 is unnecessary, but an interesting idea. 6 would be almost impossible to implement without a change in how we store the data...but doable if we decide it's necessary. I think 3 is good, and it has the benefit of being our status quo. Allowing edits to multiple annotations at once would again require the same changes to our storage system. Apart from 8 seeming like it will require some nasty CSS tricks, I like the rest!