@bmartinezcalvo can you provide some examples of where we're not doing this?

El T364401#9778337, @CCiufo-WMF escribió:

@bmartinezcalvo can you provide some examples of where we're not doing this?

@CCiufo-WMF I've included some examples in the description.

As much as we should unify terminology, I'm torn between unifying and negatively impacting readability of names beyond just technical terminology. Reading
“These external links must use the external link icon, cdxIconLinkExternal, in addition to the text to denote a destination outside of the current domain.” vs
“These external links must use the external link icon 'linkExternal', in addition to the text to denote a destination outside of the current domain.”
I prefer latter.
An alternative would be to have another column in “All icons” to include a name and then a code column.

I agree with the simpler, easy to read, latter approach in Volker's comment.

I also agree with the simpler name for icons, either within the Codex Guidelines or the List of all icons. So if possible I would rename the first columns in the List of all icons to be with the simpler name ('linkExternal'), explaining in that page that all icons will include the "cdxIcon" at the beginning of the name in code.