Wiki.Melancholie wrote:

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history (current rev is/was marked as sighted)
But the box says something different if logged in!
See also [[:de:Wikipedia:Fragen_zur_Wikipedia#Bug_oder_Verst.C3.A4ndnisfrage_zu_gesichteten_Versionen]]

Is this related to Bug 13974?

Wiki.Melancholie wrote:

Note: The basic idea, that a template change will lead to *other* content, that was not yet sighted - resulting in a status change - is good.
But then on
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history
the latest revision should not be shown as "still sighted" (light blue)!

And/or if the template gets sighted by a user all those articles should get their status back!

This report seems a bit confused. Template/image sighting is not on, so that doesn't matter.

The reason the message shows slightly differently is because the current and stable version are no longer synced, however the page itself may still only have 0 pending edits.

What might be a good idea is to tweak the wording or something.

Wiki.Melancholie wrote:

Did you try it?

Steps:

1. Log in
2. Change [[:de:Vorlage:Gesprochene_Version]]
3. Go to [[:de:Albert_Einstein]] (where the most current revision seems to (suddenly) be not sighted anymore)
4. Log out
5. [[:de:Albert_Einstein]] shows: there is a more current rev

(In reply to comment #2)

Note: The basic idea, that a template change will lead to *other* content, that
was not yet sighted - resulting in a status change - is good.
But then on
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&action=history
the latest revision should not be shown as "still sighted" (light blue)!

And/or if the template gets sighted by a user all those articles should get
their status back!

Per #3. The history is correct. The tag also seems fine. It probably could just use better wording.