Top Edits added text does not account for edits that were reverted
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Assigned To

Authored By

	MusikAnimal
	Nov 7 2017, 11:52 PM

Description

This may or may not be desirable, but it seems unlike ArticleInfo, Top Edits does not discount reverted edits when computing the total added text.

See the discrepancy with User:Ozzie10aaaa: On ArticleInfo they are reported as having added 31,252 bytes, whereas on Top Edits they are reported as having added 35,940 bytes.

If we wanted to make them consistent, the Top Edits tool might be slowed down a bit, but it might be worth it. Even better, we should show both statistics, and include the number of edits that were reverted, and in the table highlight these edits. That would be pretty nifty, I think, and would clear up the discrepancy.

Related Objects

Mentioned In: T179996: Investigate using rev_sha1 to detect reverted edits
T179762: Dyslexia article (byte count) per editor
Mentioned Here: T179996: Investigate using rev_sha1 to detect reverted edits

Event Timeline

MusikAnimal created this task.Nov 7 2017, 11:52 PM

MusikAnimal mentioned this in T179762: Dyslexia article (byte count) per editor.

MusikAnimal moved this task from Backlog to General / other on the XTools board.Nov 7 2017, 11:55 PM

thank you for ongoing help w/ article stats

so as .....
KylieTastic added a subscriber: KylieTastic.
Sat, Nov 4, 4:53 PM
Comment Actions
Hi Ozzie10aaaa, I just looked at https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Dyslexia and I see you as rank 2 by number of edits, and 5th by bytes added, so I assume you just mean the "Top 10 by added text" pie-chart that does appear to be showing differnt data. The pie chart appears to be showing the edits without the caveat 2 on the table, so editors like the anon 67.68.57.35 who do 1 edit of 242,636 bytes is top of that one...................................... It would seam reasonable it should show the same as the table

indicated will this process .......It would seam reasonable it should show the same as the table?...thank you again

I'm checking in regularly to see if theres anything new with the Dyslexia article request, I want to thank you MusikAnimal for your continued help..........Ozzie A.

MusikAnimal moved this task from General / other to Working on the XTools board.Jan 19 2018, 4:47 AM

MusikAnimal mentioned this in T179996: Investigate using rev_sha1 to detect reverted edits.

Fixed with 2ac7206, but is subject to the same caveats as ArticleInfo, as described at T179996#3911894

Check out the new and improved TopEdits! https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Ozzie10aaaa/0/Dyslexia

Top Edits added text does not account for edits that were revertedClosed, ResolvedPublicActions

Description

Related Objects

Event Timeline

Top Edits added text does not account for edits that were reverted
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions