I don't know what this is about

i.am.putnik wrote:

History page

Attached:

i.am.putnik wrote:

User rights

Attached:

i.am.putnik wrote:

Look screenshots. User can't autoreview article, but he did it.

Does he have 3000 edits and a year of age?

Wiki.Melancholie wrote:

Yes: http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Grandmaster
But for ruwiki there is: $wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote = false;
http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=flaggedrevs.php

Autoreview implicit group removed if $wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote is false in r46593

Please see:

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specjalna:U%C5%BCytkownicy/Lukasz2

http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%CA%A0&action=history (Lukasz2 edit)

there is no way to tell that this user is autoreviewer on pliwiki.

Can we have this group explicit, not in $wgImplicitGroup?

danny.leinad wrote:

It's not a bug, arugment that user is autoreviewer you can find in revision http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/FlaggedRevs/FlaggedRevs.php?r1=45603&r2=45636

On plwiki we've got also meta page about it: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Automatycznie_przeglądający

And r46593 wasn't even synced yet

(In reply to comment #10)

And r46593 wasn't even synced yet

re-closing

Well, r46593 does not change anything on plwiki.

I believe this is an important change in the user's rights and should be logged
in [[Special:Log/rights]] as well as displayed in the preferences.

Other than that, it will be just confusing. We cannot even inform the user about the change on the discussion page.

I'll add it to prefs

(In reply to comment #13)

I'll add it to prefs

Done in r47252. Not really worth logging though.

Can we sync r47252 to Wikimedia sites? We still got some users confused about "magic" autoreviewers. Thanks.

Wiki.Melancholie wrote:

Wikimedia sites even use r48811.
Note that those 'autoreviewed' entries are (and probably remain) stored in database, the history lists were not updated with that mere software code update.