We have low allocator count on these hosts too:
wdq24 261930 214 wdq25 262090 54 wdq26 261989 155
Maybe they'll survive until category migration is finished, but I don't think we should risk it. Better to copy the data (e.g. from wdq8).
We have low allocator count on these hosts too:
wdq24 261930 214 wdq25 262090 54 wdq26 261989 155
Maybe they'll survive until category migration is finished, but I don't think we should risk it. Better to copy the data (e.g. from wdq8).
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | Smalyshev | T213210 WDQS is hitting allocator limit on Blazegraph | |||
Resolved | Smalyshev | T213854 Reload database on wdq2[456] from another server |
Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2019-01-15T19:28:50Z] <SMalyshev> depooling wdqs1008 and wdqs2004 for DB copying for T213854
Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2019-01-15T19:36:51Z] <SMalyshev> started copying wdqs1008->wdqs2004 for T213854
Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2019-01-15T21:39:29Z] <SMalyshev> depooling wdqs2005 for T213854
Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2019-01-16T06:01:40Z] <SMalyshev> depooling wdq2005 and wdqs2006 for T213854