Feels like the Swedish civil parish code/ATA code P777 need some care see also T214288
Next suggested steps:
- Agree that Wikidata should use Property 777 and its same as RAÄ source raa/130
- Add source so its shown in sv:Wikipedia and in Wikidata as ref to make its more clear
- suggest document raa/130 "Förteckning över städer och socknar : alfabetiskt efter socken" dc.date.available 2012-12-20T09:22:37Z dc.date.issued 2011
- Understand diff
- Agree if Q10493768 Falköpings Östra sockenkod 3028 is correct in Wikidata
SPARQL to understand the diff
In Wikidata The property Ksamsök Property 1260 has been added to just some "socknar" but no one seems to understand why and why we have a diff between Ksamsök and the document raa/130
Lesson learned:
- RAÄ documents seems lack version number
- Ksamsök has RDF files without description, version number and no documentation that this is a subset of raa/130
- dataset Sweden, parish - http://kulturnav.org is referring to both the Ksamsök file and the RAÄ document and it looks they think its the same...
- story told is that LM should publish something 2019 see T214288 and that will be the new "official list"
- the KSAMSÖK property with value resurser/aukt/geo/parish# should not be in Wikidata it just adds confusion it should be deleted. If the purpose is to do SPARQL with the subset "socknar" Ksamsök have themself then it's better they join with this subset instead of marking all entries in another database with something that is not logical/make sense
- to make Ksamsök a good member of the Linked data community they need
- better documentation of the Ksamsök RDF files
- version number
- how it relates to file raa/130 and why its not 1 <-> 1
- as Ksamsök is managed by Riksantikvarieämbetet as a request from the Swedish Government and they are publishing something called an Geographical Authority for "socknar" with no documentation that mismatch what RAÄ publish in another document it feels like they have very bad data management and we can see it just creates confusion. Hopefully the new initiative is better managed and more serious see T214288#5311754
- to make Ksamsök a good member of the Linked data community they need
Example Q10670562 what was added 25 maj 2019 kl. 19.49
Some SPARQL
- All Property 777 with Ksamsök = 2541
- All Property 777 missing Ksamsök = 56 see Listeria list
- All Property 777 missing Ksamsök but existed after 1953 = 1 = Q10493768 Falköpings Östra sockenkod 3028
- All Ksamsök "aukt/geo/parish" missing Property 777 = 0
- All Ksamsök "aukt/geo/parish" = 2485
- SPARQL to create KSAMSök URI with todays WD data https://w.wiki/5sE
- same but mismatch
- looks like K-samsök has defined a subset of Swedish Administrative parishes ("socknar") as a Ksamsök Authority were Administrative parishes dissolved before 1953 is not part Link "Geografisk auktoritet"
- the RDF file is not very well documented why. Guess a mistake missing Falköping Östra and just use a subset
- one odd thing is that we have no versioning in the RDF file or change descriptions
- see also discussion
Dataset Sweden, parish - http://kulturnav.org
See http://kulturnav.org/d8d7f456-2ca4-49a5-a624-c5cf378417e7
- has 2439 members
- they say source is RAÄ K-samsök but they also mention document "ATA:s förteckning över städer och socknar"
very confusing I guess everyone believe RAÄ has one list with "socknar" not as today that K-samsök is a subset and miss Falköping Östra 3028
