Extracting lead section from Wikipedia articles.
Description
Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | None | T324568 {Machine Readability} Parsing Leads (Summaries) | |||
Resolved | Protsack.stephan | T321175 Investigation: large scale testing of leads | |||
Resolved | REsquito-WMF | T323238 Create leads extraction PoC MVP | |||
Resolved | JArguello-WMF | T324672 Feedback leads extraction PoC MVP | |||
Resolved | Protsack.stephan | T325294 Add abstract field to the article | |||
Resolved | prabhat | T326805 Feedback leads extraction PoC: text stripped off and data noise | |||
Resolved | prabhat | T327885 QA parsing leads | |||
Resolved | Protsack.stephan | T328341 Return empty summary/leads under certain conditions | |||
Resolved | Anribolon | T331625 [feedback] Summaries: exclude subtitle |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Can we close/retire some of the older MR Epics?
Some are done, IMHO: Leads, main image, infoboxes, and wikidata statements are parked and probably superseded by knowledge graph groups.
I'd prefer to close Epics and create new ones when and if enhancements are needed for those features, otherwise the board will be cluttered with old Epics.