beau wrote:

Sorry, I wasn't aware that anonymous users could change page status. I have submitted a change I7e08c570e7c88a13f07515e2298fc003a8f3fc95 for review, which reverts the proofreadPageUserName change.

I did not understand the second part of the report.

enomil wrote:

Screenshots as registered (top) and anonymous user (bottom) and the position of the quality buttons

Two the sesond part of the bug: anonymous user doesn't have the options for marking as minor edit and for watching page, so the nextSibling action puts the quality buttons outside of the div with the class editCheckboxes. It makes more sense for having the buttons everytime at the same position (as the last child of the div) e. g. for styling like .editCheckboxes .quality4 {} (thats why they have no color at the time at german ws).

Attached:

beau wrote:

I understand now (A picture is worth a thousand words). Can you make a separate report for that issue?

enomil wrote:

Bug 36125

(In reply to comment #1)

Sorry, I wasn't aware that anonymous users could change page status. I have
submitted a change I7e08c570e7c88a13f07515e2298fc003a8f3fc95 for review, which
reverts the proofreadPageUserName change.

gerrit #5428 -- closing pending review on gerrit

There have always been restrictions on the ability of proofreading status change by anonymous users. What are the restrictions now in place, ie. what changes, and can we say that we have discussed this with the Wikisource community prior to its implementation. Bugzilla is a cloistered environment and not particularly useful for such discussions.