Compare http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/zh/e/eb/CASC.gif and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/zh/thumb/e/eb/CASC.gif/220px-CASC.gif
P.S. We don't have an "image scaler" bugzilla component?
Version: unspecified
Severity: minor
Compare http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/zh/e/eb/CASC.gif and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/zh/thumb/e/eb/CASC.gif/220px-CASC.gif
P.S. We don't have an "image scaler" bugzilla component?
Version: unspecified
Severity: minor
(In reply to comment #0)
P.S. We don't have an "image scaler" bugzilla component?
That's bug 41371.
(In reply to comment #0)
I can not see anything wrong with the image and it's thumbnail.
(There is some #fefefe-white as background in the source gif file. If this is the problem, I could easily fix that for you)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
I can not see anything wrong with the image and it's thumbnail.
(There is some #fefefe-white as background in the source gif file. If this is
the problem, I could easily fix that for you)
I'm talking about those #f6f9fe pixels.
This seems to be an upstream bug of imagemagick's convert command line tool. (I could reproduce similar results). You may file a bug at http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewforum.php?f=3