Page MenuHomePhabricator

template {date} reserved
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Author: William.Allen.Simpson

Description:
In concert with [bug 5089], the template {date} would be reserved. It would be
used exclusively for any date with BC(E), or AD/CE, that is not notable enough
to wikilink, but needs an era preference expansion.

The template should have 3 optional parameters.

{date} will display the current date preference as a string.

{date|year} will expand to "AD year" or "year CE" when the year is positive
numeric, "year BC" or "year BCE" when the year is negative numeric, "1st
century BC" or "1st century BCE" for any other text string. Note that {era} is
required for AD/CE text, as such an era change is expected to be notable.

{date|year|month} will expand to "[[month]], AD [[year]]" or "[[month]],
[[year]] CE" when the year is positive numeric, "[[month]], [[year]] BC" or
"[[month]], [[year]] BCE" when the year is negative numeric, and the month, year
display will follow the date preferences. All parameters will be numeric.

{date|year|month|day} will expand to "[[day month]], AD [[year]]" or "[[day
month]] CE, [[year]]" when the year is positive numeric "[[day month]], [[year]]
BC" or "[[day month]], [[year]] BCE" when the year is negative numeric, and the
day month, year display will follow the date preferences. All parameters will
be numeric.

Indeed, it might be particularly handy to have the date preferences handled
during expansion to avoid a second pass by the parser?


Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement

Details

Reference
bz5091

Related Objects

StatusSubtypeAssignedTask
ResolvedNone
DeclinedNone

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 9:08 PM
bzimport added a project: MediaWiki-Parser.
bzimport set Reference to bz5091.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

William.Allen.Simpson wrote:

Oops, I forgot to remove the [[...]] links here, as these are non-wikilinked dates.

William.Allen.Simpson wrote:

Prettier.

In concert with [bug 5089], the template {date} would be
reserved. It would be used exclusively for any date with BC(E)
(or AD/CE) that is not notable enough to wikilink, but needs an
era preference expansion.

The template should have 3 optional parameters.

{date} will display the current date as a string (as now).

{date|year} will expand to:
+ positive numeric year,

"AD year" or 
"year CE"
  • negative numeric year, "year BC" or "year BCE"

text string,

"1st century BC" or 
"1st century BCE"

Note that {era} is required for AD/CE text, as such an era change
is expected to be notable.

{date|year|month} will expand to:
+ positive numeric year,

"month, AD year" or 
"month, year CE"
  • negative numeric year, "month, year BC" or "month, year BCE"

The "month, year" display will follow the date preferences.
All parameters will be numeric.

{date|year|month|day} will expand to:
+ positive numeric year,

"day month, AD year" or 
"day month, year CE"
  • negative numeric year, "day month, year BC" or "day month, year BCE"

The "day month, year" display will follow the date preferences.
All parameters will be numeric.

Indeed, it might be particularly handy to have the date
preferences handled during expansion to avoid a second pass
by the parser?

robchur wrote:

Bug 5089 implies the usage of a magic word to do this; there's no need for a
separate bug for each little bit of the same request. Marking as a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5089 ***