The last item on the line is unbalanced, confusing the ambiguity
detection. Fix the missing apostrophe.

ianslai wrote:

Ah, I didn't realize the mistake down there could affect the beginning of the
cell. Thanks!

Apostrophe handling is line-based, and that's all one line.

Unfortunately since people do stupid things like use apostrophes for spelling ;) the
system has to guess sometimes if you meant one apostrophe and an italic marker or a
bold marker; if the markup isn't balanced properly, it can guess wrong.

gangleri wrote:

(In reply to comment #3)

Apostrophe handling is line-based, and that's all one line.

Unfortunately since people do stupid things like use apostrophes for spelling

;) the

system has to guess sometimes if you meant one apostrophe and an italic marker

or a

bold marker; if the markup isn't balanced properly, it can guess wrong.

During the last week I found examples using escaping syntax like here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%27N_Crugu_Bradului&diff=47877494&oldid=46721404
Please note that there is a second unbalanced situation related to the usage of
the the parameter {{{NAME}}} which is rendered both bold and italic.

Another syntax (used inside the pipe of wiki links) was using %27.