Author: pete
Description:
At the moment double redirects "don't work" i.e. if A redirects to B and B
redirects to C and you request A you do not get page C.
However to keep Wikipedia (and other wikis) logical and well-structured, they
should. There are absolutely tons of examples where A and B are synonyms (so one
should redirect to the other) and are a subtopic of C.
Currently we have to write A redir C and B redir C. But now someone comes along
and decides to expand the subtopic and so undoes the B redirect and starts the
new article, but A still redirs to C. If we allowed double redirects then A
redirs B and B redirs would enable us to future-proof against future expansion.
This may seem a trivial application but I have personally seen dozens of
occasions where bad redirects have arisen because of this, and think it would be
really useful.
On the flip side, there is the extra processing required on-going basis (no idea
if this is "critical path" in terms of performance) and of course the
cycle-detection would have to be improved/implemented :/
thanks for listening,
Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement