Page MenuHomePhabricator

Function to se online admins
Closed, DeclinedPublic

Description

Author: to.joakim

Description:
A while ago the function Special:Contributions/newbies was aded and I think its
a realy great function. And the same mecanism I think can be used for users to
fins admins that are active/online at the moment. So maybe add
Special:Contributions/admins.


Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement

Details

Reference
bz6109

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Lowest.Nov 21 2014, 9:16 PM
bzimport set Reference to bz6109.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

Well, this would use a different approach, since listing online admins is more
dynamical than a plain newbie list.

to.joakim wrote:

(In reply to comment #1)

Well, this would use a different approach, since listing online admins is more
dynamical than a plain newbie list.

I did mean that that should be determied by if they had edited.

to.joakim wrote:

(In reply to comment #3)

Define "online".

As I think, this function shows resent edits made by admins in the same way as
Special:Contributions/newbies shows edits newly made by newbies. When taking
part of this information a user can use that information to decised wich admin
to contact in maybe a sertain hasty matter.

Ok, I would've written the explanation but the damn midair collision... Anyway,
I think that it would be better to see people who are online and browsing the
site at the moment and not just a static list of admins that have edited
recently. This can be seen on most forums, including phpBB.

Then we would need a new option on preferences: 'Hide my online status.'

robchur wrote:

Users don't *have* a per-session online status that we can pull up like that.

to.joakim wrote:

(In reply to comment #7)

Users don't *have* a per-session online status that we

can pull up like that.

I just want to make clear that I wasnt interested in
such a thing. I did want to find active admins, not
logged in ones.

soxred93 wrote:

*** Bug 17218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***