Change Details

In M101 the DropdownWidgets are currently featuring `font-weight: bold`. This was established to be visually on par with buttons. Pros for featuring `bold`: - It is a similar kind of interaction widget like button, therefore should feature bold. - It would open up a possibility of making input versus “buttonesque“ widget clearer, which opens more solutions on T147808 See [[ https://doc.wikimedia.org/oojs-ui/master/demos/#widgets-mediawiki-ltr | OOjs UI demo ]] HorizontalLayout section for a good comparison Cons: - `bold` might be too prominent in many of the dropdown use cases and be stealing focus when not needed.

In M101 the DropdownWidgets are currently featuring `font-weight: bold`. This was established to be visually on par with buttons. Pros for featuring `bold`: - It is a similar kind of interaction widget like button, therefore should feature bold. - It would open up a possibility of making input versus “buttonesque“ widget clearer, which opens more solutions on T147808 See [[ https://doc.wikimedia.org/oojs-ui/master/demos/#widgets-mediawiki-ltr | OOjs UI demo ]] HorizontalLayout section for a good comparison {F4623261} Cons: - `bold` might be too prominent in many of the dropdown use cases and be stealing focus when not needed. {F4623263}

In M101 the DropdownWidgets are currently featuring `font-weight: bold`. This was established to be visually on par with buttons. Pros for featuring `bold`: - It is a similar kind of interaction widget like button, therefore should feature bold. - It would open up a possibility of making input versus “buttonesque“ widget clearer, which opens more solutions on T147808 See [[ https://doc.wikimedia.org/oojs-ui/master/demos/#widgets-mediawiki-ltr | OOjs UI demo ]] HorizontalLayout section for a good comparison {F4623261} Cons: - `bold` might be too prominent in many of the dropdown use cases and be stealing focus when not needed. {F4623263}