#### Background
Through our user research we've learned how critical communication is with reverts. To improve communication when reverts to other people's edits are made, our team can improve the diff view. One way of making this improvement is encouraging users to leave a detailed, but respectful summary of the edit they've made (including reverts). This is aligned with Wiki policy.
#### User story
**Our current summary experience can be improved to achieve the following user stories:**
- When my edit has been reverted, I want a clear distinction between the edit summary and the diff itself, so that I can process information more efficiently.
- When editing Wikipedia, I want the interface to give me clear direction of crafting helpful summaries in line with Wiki policies, so that patrollers and other users understand why I made the change that I did to an article.
- When accessing the Watchlist, I want to review a diff and clearly understand why an edit was made, so that I have the proper context to agree or dispute the change.
#### The Task
- [ ] If someone selects other, provide some guidance from [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_summary | the edit summary policy ]] and the [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting#Explain_reverts | reverting guidance ]]
- [ ] Do not allow people to publish without an edit summary
- [ ] Reconsider ways to make the edit summary clear that it is an edit summary when looking at the diff view