== Goal
>O.5 KR?
Evaluate if the section investigation work is useful to support the Content Integrity work for references.
== To Do
1. Discuss the methods for reference parsing
2. Decide based on content integrity product needs if Machine Readability's two methods suit Content Integrity's needs
3. Engineers will write a Onepager with the outcome (technical decision) - Francisco will contribute to the text
4. Inform and confirm clarity with Stephanie and Francisco so they can make the next product decisions accordingly
== Methods to be evaluated
1. machine readability:
1.1 Enriched sections on https://gitlab.enterprise.wikimedia.com/wikimedia-enterprise/documentation/machine-readability-poc
1.2 Plain Text sections
2. Content Integrity product reasoning to consider
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321150
== Product Needs
See the ticket https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321150 to understand product needs
== Outstanding question
[] Is the method for parsing references in Machine Readability applicable to Content Integrity?
== This task is complete when
[ ] the One pager is complete with the answer to the outstanding question above and the general method of Parsing References for WME APIs documented.
[ ] Engineers have Briefed Stephanie and Francisco
[ ] Francisco and Stephanie have prioritized based on the decision made
== Methods for Citation from Research
[ ] [[ https://github.com/kay-wong/Wiki-Reliability/blob/main/MatchTemplatesUDF.ipynb | Template matching method git ]]
[ ] See Francisco's one pager on citations and references for internal link regex approach notebook
== Next Steps
After all of he above are completed the next key ticket is
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T321150
== Docs
[ ] [[ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TFwOvQ1p6ULX3JF5DQcIiJuDW61f7sBoXYUGh9-VfzI/edit | Francisco's citations one pager ]]