Allow advanced find and replace entries to be major or minor to work with the new option to "skip if only minor replacement made". @Xeno 22:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T169420 [AutoWikiBrowser] Find & Replace related tickets | |||
| Open | Feature | None | T100443 [Migrated] Allow advanced find and replace entries to be marked minor |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
@Reedy, 22:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
Haha. Magioladitis and I were discussing this when I implemented the normal FaR one.
@Xeno, 22:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
And you decided not to allow it -- just to play a cruel joke on me?
@Magioladitis, 22:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
We need a box to mark as minor in every rule (..and subrule??? :S). This is scary.
@Reedy, 22:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
Haha. More a case of decided it was useful, but not so important.
@Xeno, 22:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
I suppose the minor changes I have can be moved into the simple F/R matrix.
@Reedy, 22:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
lol. It aint gonna be done pre v5 :)
@Xeno,22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
You're a dreamkiller, sir.
@Reedy, 22:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
[[Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser#Feature_Freeze_for_AWB_v5]] ;D
@Xeno, 16:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
Bump! ;>
@Reedy, 16:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Reedy&action=historysubmit&diff=337257033&oldid=227782172 :P
@Reedy, 16:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
Sir, you really need to get your priorities in order. Just sayin'.
@Reedy, 16:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC) wrote:
f you want to do my report for me.
@gracefool, 16:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC) wrote:
Whoever eventually responds to this, please put a {{tl|whisperback}} on my userpage, as this is a very active page and I'll miss the response otherwise.
@KumiokoCleanStart, 13:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC) wrote:
I just wanted to bump this discussion. We'ere at version 5 now so could we please reconsider this?
Comment Actions
This task has been assigned to the same task owner for more than two years. Resetting task assignee due to inactivity, to decrease task cookie-licking and to get a slightly more realistic overview of plans. Please feel free to assign this task to yourself again if you still realistically work or plan to work on this task - it would be welcome!
For tips how to manage individual work in Phabricator (noisy notifications, lists of task, etc.), see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228575#6237124 for available options.
(For the records, two emails were sent to assignee addresses before resetting assignees. See T228575 for more info and for potential feedback. Thanks!)