I added this definition for the three buttons:

Page Fixed: The edit is determined to be copyvio, and the user has reverted or fixed the page.

No Action Needed: The edit is a false positive, nothing needs to be done.

Request 2nd Opinion: The edit looks like copyvio, but it's a complicated edit that the user isn't sure how to fix. These items are flagged for the more experienced users to take a look.

@DannyH, I think the latest additions to this patch description should be moved to another new ticket because they sure seem worth another two story points or so.
More than the code, it's the design of it that sucks up time and effort.
(Aside, I think we should avoid adding new tasks to already estimated tickets to avoid it messing up with our velocity estimation)

Buttons can be used more than once if someone else disagrees with the state. When a user clicks on either button, a confirmation message pops up: Are you sure that you want to change the review setting? Yes / No. When the user confirms, the state goes back to untriaged.

After some thinking, I think this is a bad idea. It's essentially an edit war. Edit which is reverted over and over. Allowing this in the interface would likely *encourage* more such behavior.

It makes most sense to stick with what's been tried and tested and is known to work on Copyright/rc for the first iteration of our tool. Eventually, as we open this for people, we can ask them for ideas and what they think is important and needs to be added.

I pressed a button by mistake, I'd like to know how can I undo my action. Thank you.

In T132079#2270482, @Ricordisamoa wrote:

I pressed a button by mistake, I'd like to know how can I undo my action. Thank you.

No worries. Database writes are disabled.

(I'll add a notice for this so people stop freaking out :)

In T132079#2270488, @Niharika wrote:

No worries. Database writes are disabled.

😌

We're also going to add a way to undo a mistaken click:

T134597: Copy Patrol interface: User can undo their own mistaken review